<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civil Litigation - Insurance - Construction - Denver Colorado Attorneys &#187; Rulings and Orders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.LCLaw.net/rulings-and-orders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.LCLaw.net</link>
	<description>Attorneys at Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Motion for Summary Judgment entered regarding time-barred claims</title>
		<link>http://www.LCLaw.net/2011/04/18/motion-summary-judgment-entered-timebarred-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.LCLaw.net/2011/04/18/motion-summary-judgment-entered-timebarred-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rulings and Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.LCLaw.net/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Lucero v. Griego, pending in Adams County District Court, Judge Edward Moss found that the relation back doctrine was inapplicable and that the Plaintiff&#8217;s claims against our client and co-owner of a vehicle involved in an accident were time-barred]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <em>Lucero v. Griego,</em> pending in Adams County District Court, Judge Edward Moss found that the relation back doctrine was inapplicable and that the Plaintiff&#8217;s claims against our client and co-owner of a vehicle involved in an accident were time-barred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.LCLaw.net/2011/04/18/motion-summary-judgment-entered-timebarred-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sweigart v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, District Court for Larimer County, 09CV1228 (06/29/2010).</title>
		<link>http://www.LCLaw.net/2010/07/05/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.LCLaw.net/2010/07/05/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rulings and Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator1125.hostgator.com/~garcia49/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorneys Suzanne Lambdin and Stephanie Montague obtained summary  judgment in favor of Fire Insurance Exchange. The court determined as a matter of  law that the damage  caused by a methamphetamine lab was not covered under the  vandalism peril in the insured&#8217;s renters policy. Additionally, the court determined that  the Pollution Exclusion in the renters policy ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-17" title="gavel" src="http://gator1125.hostgator.com/~garcia49/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/gavel-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /> Attorneys Suzanne Lambdin and Stephanie Montague obtained summary  judgment in favor of Fire Insurance Exchange. The court determined as a matter of  law that the damage  caused by a methamphetamine lab was not covered under the  vandalism peril in the insured&#8217;s renters policy. Additionally, the court determined that  the Pollution Exclusion in the renters policy precluded coverage for the claimed  damages caused by methamphetamine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.LCLaw.net/2010/07/05/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

